The Two Approaches to Document Conversion
When you need to convert documents to Markdown, two tools come up repeatedly: Pandoc, the venerable command-line converter, and PagesToMD, a modern web-based solution. Both convert documents to Markdown, but they take fundamentally different approaches.
This comparison helps you understand when to use each tool—because the right choice depends entirely on your specific needs.
Quick Comparison
PagesToMD: Simplicity First
PagesToMD takes the complexity out of document conversion. Upload your files, click convert, download Markdown.
Strengths
Zero SetupOpen your browser, drag in files, get Markdown. There's nothing to install, configure, or update. This matters when you need to convert a document right now, not after figuring out command-line syntax.
Apple Pages SupportPagesToMD was built specifically to handle .pages files—a format most converters ignore entirely. If you work on Mac, this alone might be the deciding factor.
Batch Processing with ProgressUpload up to 100 files and watch them convert in real-time. Download individually or as a ZIP. No scripting required.
Consistent OutputThe web interface means everyone gets the same conversion settings. No "it worked on my machine" issues when sharing converted files with teammates.
Limitations
Internet RequiredPagesToMD runs in the cloud. No offline conversion option.
Less CustomizationYou can't tweak every conversion parameter. The tool makes sensible defaults, but power users may want more control.
File Size LimitsIndividual files cap at 50MB. Large documents need splitting.
Ideal Use Cases
Pandoc: Power and Flexibility
Pandoc bills itself as the "universal document converter." It's open source, incredibly powerful, and handles more formats than any other tool.
Strengths
Unmatched Format SupportPandoc converts between dozens of formats: Markdown, HTML, LaTeX, EPUB, Word, PDF, reStructuredText, and many more. If you need to convert from Markdown to something else, Pandoc is often the only option.
Extensive CustomizationControl every aspect of conversion through command-line options, templates, and Lua filters. Want to transform specific elements during conversion? Pandoc can do it.
Automation ReadyWrap Pandoc in scripts, integrate it into CI/CD pipelines, batch process thousands of files. The command-line interface enables workflows that GUI tools can't match.
Free and Open SourceNo cost, no usage limits, no vendor lock-in. Install it once and use it forever.
Offline OperationEverything runs locally. No internet connection needed, no files uploaded anywhere.
Limitations
Learning CurvePandoc's power comes with complexity. Simple conversions require learning command-line basics. Advanced use requires understanding Pandoc's document model, templates, and filters.
Installation RequiredYou need to install Pandoc (and potentially Haskell dependencies) on each machine. This becomes a barrier in locked-down corporate environments or when helping non-technical colleagues.
Inconsistent Format SupportWhile Pandoc supports many formats, quality varies. Some conversions work beautifully; others produce subpar results. Apple Pages support, in particular, is limited.
No Visual FeedbackCommand-line output doesn't show you what's happening inside the document. You won't know if tables converted correctly until you open the output file.
Ideal Use Cases
Head-to-Head: Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Converting 20 PDFs for a RAG System
PagesToMD approach:Time: 5 minutes
Pandoc approach:for f in *.pdf; do pandoc "$f" -o "${f%.pdf}.md"; doneTime: 5-15 minutes (depending on familiarity)
Winner: Tie. PagesToMD is faster for occasional users. Pandoc is fine if you're comfortable with the command line.Scenario 2: Converting Apple Pages Files
PagesToMD approach: Upload .pages files directly. They just work. Pandoc approach: Pandoc's Pages support is limited. You'd likely need to export from Pages to another format first, then convert that. Winner: PagesToMD. Native Pages support is a significant advantage.Scenario 3: Converting Markdown to EPUB
PagesToMD approach: Not supported. PagesToMD converts TO Markdown, not FROM it. Pandoc approach:pandoc book.md -o book.epub
Simple and effective.
Winner: Pandoc. This is exactly what it's built for.Scenario 4: Team of Non-Technical Writers
PagesToMD approach: Share the URL. Everyone can convert documents without training. Pandoc approach: Install Pandoc on each machine. Train everyone on basic command-line usage. Support inevitable "it's not working" tickets. Winner: PagesToMD. The learning curve matters when rolling out to teams.Scenario 5: Automated Documentation Pipeline
PagesToMD approach: Would require API access (not currently available for automation). Pandoc approach: Perfect fit. Script the conversion, run it in CI, integrate with your build process. Winner: Pandoc. Automation is its strength.Making the Decision
Choose PagesToMD if:
Choose Pandoc if:
Using Both Tools
Here's a secret: you don't have to choose just one.
Many workflows benefit from both tools:
The tools complement rather than compete. Keep both in your toolkit and use whichever fits the task at hand.
Conclusion
PagesToMD and Pandoc represent two philosophies: simplicity versus power. PagesToMD removes friction for the common case of converting documents to Markdown. Pandoc provides unlimited flexibility for users willing to invest in learning it.
For most users converting documents to Markdown occasionally, PagesToMD's zero-setup approach wins. For developers and power users with automation needs, Pandoc remains indispensable.
The best tool is the one that gets your documents converted with the least friction. Try both, and use what works for your workflow.